Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Don's avatar

Excellent article on the seeming paradox of mystic journey silence, yet creation coming from sound (word). It has been said “God’s first language its Silence”; This famous quote has been attributed to St. John of the Cross and Father Thomas Keating, Keating elaborating further; “Silence is God's first language; everything else is a poor translation.” And this article builds on such foundation.

Then there is the contrast with sound/words. In many spiritual traditions the universe was created by God speaking, i.e. In the Bible, Genesis: and God said, “Let there be light,” … And God said, “Let there be a vault between the waters to separate water from water.” … Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, just some excerpts from Biblical creation. Then there is the word, Om (Aum), it is considered the elemental sound of the creation of the universe encompassing all of creation, existence, and consciousness. Another example from ancient Egypt is “Hu” (ḥw), it was the creative utterance, the deification of the first word, the word of creation. These are some examples of God speaking for creation. The Bible makes a further point of it in John 1 King James Version;1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God, often referred to as the “Logos”. It certainly seems, with these examples, particularly with “in the beginning was the Word”, there was much speaking/sound.

Both spiritual philosophies and science (Big Bang) put forth that creation came from sound.

So, can the documentation of spiritual philosophies and science putting forth creation came from sound be reconciled with the ambiguous metaphors of “Silence is God's first language” and God’s first language is silence; everything else is a poor translation.”? I believe the answer is yes.

My answer may be considered nuanced, yet it broadens and still encompasses the concept of God’s language being silence and still one of sound/speaking/vibrations.

Rather than God’s first language being silence, that on its surface, is like a paradoxical Zen koan, rather it maybe stated as God’s first language is experiencing. Experiencing also transcends words. It leads to silence, but does not originate in silence., experiencing cannot truly be put into words, words would be a “poor translation”.

It is the experiencing of it that goes so far beyond any words or pictures. In experiencing the awe, we would want to share the awe with others in words, symbols or images and yes, it will be a poor translation of the experience, but one with hope for others experiencing. We would also resonate with others with such experiencing where words would not be needed.

Silence is not the language of God; experiencing is the language of God; everything else is a poor translation.

Perhaps silence allow one to Embrace the experiencing.

No posts

Ready for more?